The Securities and Exchange Commission filed proposed final consent judgments on July 8, 2026, against Robert Alan Yedid, Andrew Kaufman, and Mark Jacobs for insider trading that generated more than $500,000 in combined illegal profits. The case, originally charged in August 2025, involves trading ahead of a corporate acquisition using material nonpublic information.
What happened
The SEC originally charged the three defendants in August 2025 with insider trading violations. The proposed consent judgments were filed in court on July 8, 2026, marking a step toward resolution of the enforcement action. The case is documented under SEC Litigation Release LR-26582.
According to the SEC, the defendants traded securities of a target company before a public acquisition announcement. They allegedly used confidential information about the pending deal to position their accounts ahead of the market. The trading generated substantial profits that the SEC now seeks to recover through disgorgement and penalties.
Key facts and dollar figures
The SEC alleges that Yedid, Kaufman, and Jacobs collectively realized more than $500,000 in illegal profits from their trading activity. The proposed consent judgments include financial penalties and injunctive relief.
| Defendant | Status | Alleged Profits |
| Robert Alan Yedid | Proposed consent judgment | Part of $500,000+ total |
| Andrew Kaufman | Proposed consent judgment | Part of $500,000+ total |
| Mark Jacobs | Proposed consent judgment | Part of $500,000+ total |
The consent judgments, if approved by the court, would permanently enjoin the defendants from violating antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. The defendants would also be required to pay disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties.
How the scheme allegedly worked
Insider trading ahead of corporate acquisitions typically involves someone with advance knowledge of a pending deal who either trades directly or shares the information with others who then trade. The SEC’s Market Abuse Unit uses data analytics to detect suspicious trading patterns in target companies before announcement dates.
In this case, the defendants allegedly purchased securities in the target company during the period leading up to the acquisition announcement. After the deal was publicly disclosed and the stock price reacted positively, they sold their positions at a profit. The timing and size of the trades attracted regulatory attention.
SEC enforcement trends in insider trading
The SEC has intensified its focus on insider trading in recent years. The Market Abuse Unit employs sophisticated algorithms to identify abnormal trading patterns. Cases involving merger-related insider trading are a particular priority because they undermine market integrity and disadvantage ordinary investors who trade without advance knowledge.
The July 2026 filing continues a pattern of enforcement actions against individuals who trade on tips about pending corporate transactions. The SEC has brought similar cases against tippees in social networks, family members of insiders, and business associates with access to confidential deal information.
What affected investors should understand
Investors who traded in the same securities during the period of insider trading may have suffered harm from artificial price movements. Illegal trading ahead of announcements can inflate or deflate stock prices in ways that disadvantage market participants without access to nonpublic information.
Securities fraud victims have legal avenues to pursue recovery. Arbitration and civil litigation can result in compensation for losses tied to fraudulent market activity. The statute of limitations for securities fraud claims is generally five years, but acting promptly preserves evidence and strengthens legal positions.
Haselkorn & Thibaut fights for investor recovery
Haselkorn & Thibaut is a securities law firm founded by former Wall Street defense attorneys who shifted their practice to represent investors. The firm has recovered over $520 million for clients in securities matters and maintains a 98 percent success rate in resolved nontraded REIT cases. Attorneys are AV Preeminent rated through Martindale-Hubbell, designated as Super Lawyers, and hold a 5.0-star client review average. The firm operates on a contingency basis — no recovery, no fee.
Contact Haselkorn & Thibaut today
Time matters in securities recovery cases. The earlier you act, the stronger your position. The firm offers a free case evaluation to assess your losses, review your account history, and explain your options under arbitration or settlement.
- Main Phone: 1-888-885-7162
- website for a free consultation
Offices in Florida, New York, Arizona, Texas, and North Carolina. Former Wall Street defense attorneys with 95+ years of combined experience. No recovery, no fee.
