Foundations Investment Advisors, LLC and its former CEO have been ordered to pay approximately $150,000 in disgorgement plus a $1.2 million civil penalty in an SEC administrative action filed June 8, 2026. The firm, identified in release IA-6970, failed to disclose conflicts of interest related to investments recommended to advisory clients. The case highlights ongoing SEC scrutiny of investment adviser transparency around revenue-sharing and proprietary product recommendations.
What happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission found that Foundations Investment Advisors recommended certain investments to clients without adequately disclosing conflicts of interest that influenced those recommendations. The firm and its former CEO were accused of violating the Investment Advisers Act by failing to provide full and fair disclosure of material facts.
On June 8, 2026, the SEC issued release IA-6970, ordering the firm to cease and desist from further violations, censuring the company and imposing monetary penalties. The former CEO was also named in the proceeding.
Key facts
| Firm | Foundations Investment Advisors, LLC |
| SEC release | IA-6970 (June 8, 2026) |
| Civil penalty | $1.2 million |
| Disgorgement | Approximately $150,000 plus interest |
| Sanctions | Cease-and-desist, censure |
| Violation | Investment Advisers Act – failure to disclose conflicts |
| Named individuals | Former CEO (name in SEC release) |
The conflict-of-interest problem in advisory accounts
Investment advisers owe clients a fiduciary duty, meaning they must act in the client’s best interest and disclose any conflicts that could compromise that duty. When an adviser recommends investments that generate additional revenue for the adviser or an affiliate, that conflict is material. Clients deserve to know that the recommendation may be influenced by compensation rather than pure investment merit.
In this case, Foundations Investment Advisors allegedly failed to make those disclosures. Clients may have believed their portfolios were constructed solely for their benefit, when undisclosed revenue-sharing arrangements may have played a role in the investment selections. The SEC considers such omissions a serious breach of fiduciary duty.
What investors lost
While the SEC order did not specify exact per-client losses, the $1.2 million civil penalty and $150,000 disgorgement signal that the misconduct generated meaningful financial harm. Clients who paid advisory fees based on conflicted recommendations may have also paid higher expenses or earned lower returns than they would have with truly impartial advice.
Investors who used Foundations Investment Advisors during the relevant period should review their account statements for proprietary products or affiliated fund recommendations. If those products underperformed comparable alternatives, the undisclosed conflict may have caused measurable financial damage.
Red flags that should have been caught
Advisory firms are required to file Form ADV Part 2A brochures that describe conflicts of interest in plain language. If Foundations Investment Advisors buried its conflicts in vague footnotes or omitted them entirely, compliance officers and the SEC should have identified the gap during routine audits.
The fact that the SEC brought an administrative action suggests either the firm’s disclosures were inadequate or the firm actively concealed the arrangements. Either scenario points to a breakdown in compliance culture that ultimately cost clients money and the firm its reputation.
What affected investors can do now
Current and former clients of Foundations Investment Advisors should request a complete copy of their advisory agreements, Form ADV brochures, and trade history. Compare the disclosed conflicts against the actual investments held in the account during the relevant period.
If the firm recommended proprietary or revenue-sharing products without clear disclosure, investors may have grounds for a securities arbitration claim. The SEC order itself can be used as evidence that the firm violated its fiduciary duty. Investors should gather all account statements, fee invoices, and correspondence before consulting a securities attorney.
Haselkorn & Thibaut fights for investor recovery
Haselkorn & Thibaut is a securities law firm founded by former Wall Street defense attorneys who shifted their practice to represent investors. The firm has recovered over $520 million for clients in securities matters and maintains a 98 percent success rate in resolved nontraded REIT cases. Attorneys are AV Preeminent rated through Martindale-Hubbell, designated as Super Lawyers, and hold a 5.0-star client review average. The firm operates on a contingency basis — no recovery, no fee.
Contact Haselkorn & Thibaut today
Time matters in recovery cases. The earlier you act, the stronger your position. The firm offers a free case evaluation to assess your losses, review your account history, and explain your options under arbitration or settlement.
- Main Phone: 1-888-885-7162
- Visit htattorneys.com for a free consultation
Offices in Florida, New York, Arizona, Texas, and North Carolina. Former Wall Street defense attorneys with 95+ years of combined experience. No recovery, no fee.
