Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated has agreed to pay a $7.5 million civil penalty to the Securities and Exchange Commission for systemic failures to file Suspicious Activity Reports between April 2020 and September 2024. The SEC found that Merrill relied on a mis-calibrated anti-money-laundering risk-scoring threshold that caused its transaction-monitoring system to miss suspicious activity that should have triggered SAR filings.
What the SEC found
The SEC issued a cease-and-desist order against Merrill Lynch for willful violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 17a-8. The firm failed to file numerous SARs on suspicious activity detected by its AML system during the four-and-a-half-year period.
Merrill relied on parent company Bank of America’s enterprise-wide AML program and transaction-monitoring software. The system grouped activity into risk-scored event groups. Only groups above a predefined risk threshold were investigated. Internal analyses at Merrill showed as early as April 2020 that some lower-scoring event groups contained genuinely suspicious activity, yet the threshold was not corrected.
The numbers behind the penalty
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Civil penalty | $7.5 million |
| Violation period | April 2020 – September 2024 |
| Regulatory basis | Exchange Act Section 17(a), Rule 17a-8 |
| Sanctions | Cease-and-desist, censure, penalty, remediation |
The SEC noted that the mis-calibrated threshold was a known issue within Merrill’s compliance department. Despite internal reports identifying the problem, the firm took years to implement a fix. That delay allowed thousands of potentially suspicious transactions to go unreported to FinCEN.
Why AML failures matter to investors
SAR filings are the primary mechanism by which broker-dealers alert federal authorities to potential money laundering, fraud, and other criminal activity. When a firm fails to file SARs, illicit activity can continue unchecked. Investors in the firm’s funds or custodial accounts may face indirect exposure to reputational and regulatory risk.
Merrill Lynch is one of the largest broker-dealers in the United States. Its AML failures occurred across a period that included significant market volatility and increased retail trading activity. The SEC’s action signals that even systemically important firms are not exempt from core compliance obligations.
What investors should watch now
Investors who held accounts at Merrill Lynch during the violation period should review their statements for unusual transactions. Red flags include unexplained wire transfers, frequent changes in account beneficiaries, or trades in securities that do not match the account’s stated investment objectives.
The SEC has required Merrill to enhance its AML controls and monitoring systems. Investors should expect improved reporting and possibly additional documentation requests when opening new accounts or executing large transactions.
Haselkorn & Thibaut fights for investor recovery
Haselkorn & Thibaut is a securities law firm founded by former Wall Street defense attorneys who shifted their practice to represent investors. The firm has recovered over $520 million for clients in securities matters and maintains a 98 percent success rate in resolved nontraded REIT cases. Attorneys are AV Preeminent rated through Martindale-Hubbell, designated as Super Lawyers, and hold a 5.0-star client review average. The firm operates on a contingency basis — no recovery, no fee.
Contact Haselkorn & Thibaut today
Time matters in securities recovery cases. The earlier you act, the stronger your position. The firm offers a free case evaluation to assess your losses, review your account history, and explain your options under arbitration or settlement.
- Main Phone: 1-888-885-7162
- Visit htattorneys.com for a free consultation
Offices in Florida, New York, Arizona, Texas, and North Carolina. Former Wall Street defense attorneys with 95+ years of combined experience. No recovery, no fee.
AlphaBetaStock.com is a financial news publisher. This article is for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. Investors should consult a qualified securities attorney regarding specific matters.
