Wells Fargo has agreed to pay more than $3.7 billion to settle charges of widespread infractions across its business lines. The CFPB announced on Tuesday that it had reached a settlement with the company on charges that it charged consumers illegal fees and interest on auto and home loans, among other violations that led to the illegal seizure of thousands of vehicles and the wrongful foreclosure of homes.
Additionally, the regulator said that Wells Fargo had charged customers’ checking and savings accounts with unlawful, unexpected overdraft fees and other costs.
The CFPB reports that Wells settled for over $2 billion to compensate over 16 million customers and a $1.7 billion fine.
According to Bloomberg, the fine is a first for the CFPB.
|
Since the discovery in 2016 that thousands of its retail bank employees opened millions of bogus accounts without consumers’ permission to meet aggressive sales goals, Wells Fargo has been under scrutiny from U.S. authorities and politicians.
After being fined $100 by the CFPB for its role in the bogus account scandal of 2016, the company was hit with a $1 billion fine for infractions in other business areas two years later. Last month, it was reported that Wells and the CFPB were close to finalizing a $1 billion deal. Bloomberg reported in October that CEO Charlie Scharf stated the $2 billion set aside in the third quarter “isn’t the end of it” in terms of the company’s plans to settle regulatory and legal concerns.
The Wall Street Journal, citing the CFPB, reports that Wells has already restored $1.3 billion to 11 million auto-loan customers, for example, out of the $2 billion in remediation fines it agreed to pay in the most recent settlement.
Regulators’ interest in the matter will not end with the most recent settlement.
In a statement, CFPB director Rohit Chopra said, “Wells Fargo’s rinse-and-repeat pattern of breaching the law has hurt millions of American families.” As reported by Reuters, Chopra also suggested that limits be imposed on the bank beyond the $1.95 trillion asset cap imposed by the U.S. Federal Reserve in 2018.
Stock broker fraud is a serious problem that can affect any investor. These scams take place in many ways and can be categorized into three categories. These are outright theft, front running of block transactions, and churning and scalping.
Churning
Churning stock broker fraud occurs when a brokerage firm engages in too many transactions in a customer’s account. This type of activity aims to generate a commission for the brokerage firm.
The SEC and other regulators have strict rules against churning. These regulations include the requirement that written notices accompany all transactions.
In addition to the above-mentioned rule, brokers must have a reasonable basis for their recommendations. They have a legal obligation to trade in the portfolio’s best interests. Some brokers take advantage of their clients by offering unsuitable investments or even holding onto poorly performing ones.
A stockbroker who engages in churning is not only a criminal, but he or she is also liable for the costs associated with the trades. This includes fees, commissions, and the loss of investment value.
There are several ways to identify churning, including the number of trades in the account, the rate at which the broker makes purchases and commissions, the turnover ratio, and the amount of money lost. When investigating the matter, pay close attention to monthly statements, especially those relating to commissions and fees.
Front-running of block transactions
Front-running of block transactions is a form of market manipulation that has been deemed illegal. The practice is akin to insider trading. In front-running, a stock broker will purchase or sell an asset for the benefit of his or her own personal investment portfolio.
It’s not only a bad idea but also unethical. The person doing the front-running often will not know that they’re doing it. This can be problematic because the broker’s actions may have cost their clients money.
Front running is more complex than it seems. There are three main forms of conduct that qualify as front-running. Each raises its own regulatory questions.
One of the most basic types of front-running is the use of a bot. These automated programs watch the mempool for a given transaction and broadcast it to the blockchain. When the bot finds a profitable transaction, it will execute the trade for a profit.
Another method of front-running is to buy or sell ahead of a limited order. For instance, a customer might place an order to buy 50,000 Company A shares. However, the customer’s broker will hold the order until after he or she makes a personal investment in the same company.
Scalping
Scalping is a type of arbitrage trading that involves buying and selling securities within a short period of time. This strategy can be extremely profitable but also requires quick thinking, high concentration, and lightning-fast trade execution.
Stock scalping is a form of illegal stock manipulation. It occurs when a person buys and sells a security for their own account and does not disclose that information.
A stock scalper may use a variety of strategies to maximize profits. One common approach involves waiting for a small tick upwards to sell. Another involves taking advantage of news and other events to profit.
Using technical analysis to analyze a stock’s past price movement is another popular way to the scalp. Some of the most popular indicators include Ichimoku Kinko Hyo, Bollinger Bands, and exponential moving averages.
Scalping has become a hot topic on OTCMarkets. These traders often use charts to identify trading events and make entry and exit points.
The SEC has issued multiple enforcement actions against promoters. They have been accused of committing several fraudulent activities, including misappropriating investor funds.
Outright theft
If you’re an investor, you’re likely aware that you’re vulnerable to losing money through broker fraud. Many investors have lost a lot of their investment funds due to this type of misconduct. But you might not be aware that you have a right to seek full compensation for these losses.
Stockbroker fraud involves taking money from client accounts without their knowledge or consent. Brokers do this in several ways. They can mislead clients, ignore sell orders, and engage in unauthorized trading.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed two complaints against a brokerage firm in Brooklyn, N.Y. One alleged that a trader had engaged in an illegal kickback scheme. And the other accused the firm of falsifying business records.
Brokers can also take money from clients in other ways. For example, they can forge a customer’s signature on a check. These actions are common in the financial industry.
Outright theft occurs when a stockbroker uses his or her position to steal money from a client’s trading account. It’s easy to see how this can happen. During the course of a trading session, a broker may try to convince a client to keep a stock. Often, he or she will provide half-truths to convince the client.